Indigofera cassioides ?;
VF Week: Indigofera for id from the trek…: 8 posts by 5 authors. Attachments (7)
It looks like Indigofera cassioides.
I have changed my mind after seeing … post.
May be Indigofera heterantha
I too think it is Indigofera pulchella or Indigofera cassioidies based on number of leaflets which is 19 or anywhere between 7 and 19
CG2010-4 – efloraofindia | Google Groups : 5 posts by 4 authors. Attachments (2)
Indigofera cassioides (Family: Fabaceae) is common in Sahyadri ranges. The plant in discussion looks similar to this.
I guess correct ID !
Indigofera sp. id help:
It looks like Indigofera casssioides.
I guess correct ID !
My Pending Identifications: Chakrata-Indigofera:: NS MARCH 05 : 3 posts by 2 authors. Attachments (4).
efi page on Indigofera cassioides
Fabacaceae week Indigofera tinctoria for sharing from Nashik : 9 posts by 2 authors. Attachments (4)
attaching images of Indigofera tinctoria for sharing
Does not seem to match with images at Indigofera tinctoria.
after checking again it seems to be Indigofera heterantha. please confirm
Indigofera heterantha is mainly found in Himalayas as per distribution below:
This should be Indigofera tinctoria; leaves pinnately compound, leaflets usually 9-13 as in two attached images. Found on hill slopes in shady areas, common in Karanjul and Sabargada areas of Nashik.
kindly see the link below, I believe that this sp. is Indigofera cassioides
I guess correct ID :
Fabaceae (Faboideae) Fortnight :: Indigofera for id :: Morni :: NS OCT 64/64 : 3 posts by 2 authors. Attachments (6)
Indigofera species in eFloraofindia (with details/ keys from published papers/ regional floras/ FRLHT/ FOI/ Biotik/ efloras/ books etc., where ever available on net)
I think close to images at Indigofera hebepetala Baker
I do not think this is Indigofera hebepetala..
This is more likely to be I. cassioides..!!
Thanks, …, But image of Indigofera cassioides DC. look quite different.
Pl. see the post: ANJUN44/45 Indigofera sp. for identification 4 (Churdhar Trip 44)
Yes …, I have gone through these pages, there is lot of confusion in this genus and it needs to be critically examined. Actually I had posted those images on facebook group and the inputs received pointed to Indigofera cassioides DC, but in any case this is not I. hebepetala..
I guess it is close to Indigofera cedrorum Dunn!
Thanks a lot … for this impressive hint, I will explore further..