Picea sitchensis ? (USA)

Picea sitchensis (Bong.) Carrière,  Traité Gén. Conif.: 260 (1855) (syn: Abies falcata Raf. ; Abies menziesii (Douglas ex D.Don) Lindl. ; Abies merkiana Fisch. ex Parl.; Abies sitchensis (Bong.) Lindl. & Gordon; Abies trigona Raf. ; Picea falcata (Raf.) Valck.Sur. ; Picea grandis Gordon & Glend. ; Picea menziesii (Douglas ex D.Don) Carrière ; Picea menziesii var. crispa (Antoine) Carrière ; Picea sitchensis f. speciosa Beissn. ; Pinus menziesii Douglas ex D.Don ; Pinus menziesii var. crispa Antoine ; Pinus sitchensis Bong.; Sequoia rafinesquei Carrière; Tsuga sitchensis (Bong.) Regel );
.
Alaska to W. U.S.A.: Alaska, British Columbia, California, Oregon, Washington; Introduced into: Austria, Baltic States, Belgium, Czechia-Slovakia, Denmark, France, Føroyar, Germany, Great Britain, Iceland, Ireland, Netherlands, Newfoundland, Norway, Poland as per POWO;
.

---

Tree For ID : California : 28OCT14 : AK-38 : 7 posts by 4 authors. Attachments (4)
Tree seen at the Golden Gate Park, in San Francisco on 30th Sept,14.
Could be Pine Species.

---

Picea abies ‘Pendula’?…just a guess!

---

as per my knowledge its Abies spp. looking more similar with Abies spectabilis found in Himalayas. Please check ‘Conifers of the world by Dolimore and jackson’ for clear identification.
Also clear pic of leaves+ male & female cone is needed for authentic identification

---

I am glad … said this: “Also clear pic of leaves+ male & female cone is needed for authentic identification.”
i remember asking in another thread if you had collected pic of cones…
conifers are tricky to diagnose on just pics. in passing

---

Thanks for your feedback which I do appreciate. Please convey my thanks to …
Unfortunately, these are the only pictures I have.

---

Does it not look similar to one of the Pinus species posted by you recently?

---

I think it could be Picea pungens or Picea abies.

---

I tried but could not find a match with any of these.

---