# Tree for id 070610MK3: 4 images. Date/Time- 04-05-2010 / 02:00 PM
Location- Place, Altitude, GPS- Mudumalai wls; 700 msl Habitat- Garden/ Urban/ Wild/ Typriparian and also on closer deciduous forests Plant Habit-tree with whitish bark Height/Length- ca. 5 m Leaves Type/ Shape/ Size- 10 x 4cm; oblique at base – … the leaves remind me of Ziziphus oenoplia … BUT cannot see the spines !! Could be wrong. – the leaves do look life Ziziphus oenoplia !! but the plant is spineless even the young shoots have spines I have seen it . – Unlike Ziziphus oenoplia this is an unarmed tree. Yet the leaf characters resemble Ziziphus oenoplia – … not Trema orientalis. – G.hirsuta is a shrub and it have hirsute plant body; whereas the posted picture has nearly glabrous leaves and is a tree. Kindly refer the following link for G. hirsuta.: http://groups.google.co.in/group/indiantreepix/thread/b… I am requesting the id of this tree once again with more pictures. Please help me. Any possibilities for this to be a Sapindaceae member? … are these all photographs of same tree – same time ? Sorry for not mentioning the details. The d 024 to d 31 were taken at Nilgiris Eastern slope area (12 Feb 2011; Alt: 400msl) and the pics E104-107 were taken at Mudumalai wls, TN (04 May 2010). But both the locations are at
same river bank, with a gross distance of 30KM. Yes, … the tree matches the descriptions of Trema orientalis. Yes, I too think it is Trema orientalis.
As … has mentioned you have possibly mixed-up the photographs. Granted that the leaves in some of the photographs look like those of Gol [Trema orientalis], but the flowers do not match. … please consider the female flowers (me could be wrong) … here, already in the fruiting stage … the male flowers relatively (slightly) larger normally meet the eye. … the set of first pictures E104-107 showing only leaves and branch, taken at Mudumalai WLS, do not seem to be of Trema. your picture belongs to Trema orientalis which is a member of family Ulmaceae very common in the riparian forests ID confirmed by … |