{"id":1293789,"date":"2011-04-01T11:28:08","date_gmt":"2011-04-01T11:28:08","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2024-12-24T18:48:29","modified_gmt":"2024-12-24T13:18:29","slug":"tecoma-fulva","status":"publish","type":"ht_kb","link":"https:\/\/efloraofindia.com\/efi\/tecoma-fulva\/","title":{"rendered":"Tecoma fulva"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n\n\n\n
\n
\n
Tecoma<\/i> fulva<\/i> (Cav.) G.Don<\/font><\/a>, Gen. Hist. 4: 224 1838 <\/i>and its subspecies;<\/div>\n
\u00a0<\/div>\n
Cahuato;<\/b><\/div>\n
\u00a0<\/div>\n
As per efi thread<\/a><\/div>\n
Tecoma fulva<\/b> has winged rachis<\/font> whereas the Tecoma x smithii<\/b> is wingless;<\/font>\u00a0\u00a0<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
As per efi thread<\/a>: <\/div>\n
What we think as T. fulva<\/i> is a complex with many subspecies and cultivars. Here is a beautiful article on Taxonomy of Tecoma<\/i>, from Bolivia, South America, native land of Tecoma<\/i>\u00a0 <\/font><\/div>\n
https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/botlinnean\/article\/156\/1\/143\/2418201<\/font><\/a><\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
A revision of Tecoma Juss. (Bignoniaceae) in Bolivia<\/font><\/a> by JRI Wood (Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 2008, 156, 143\u2013172): <\/div>\n
\n
KEY TO TECOMA SPECIES IN BOLIVIA<\/u>
1. Corolla yellow (sometimes with reddish veins), ventricose above a shortly cylindrical, strongly demarcated base, \u00b1campanulate in form; anthers sparsely pilose ……2
1a. Corolla red, red and yellow, or orange (very rarely yellow), gradually widened from the base, \u00b1cylindrical-tubular in form; anthers glabrous ……..3
2. Leaves simple; corolla completely glabrous externally ………..1. Tecoma beckii<\/b>
2a. Leaves five- to nine-foliolate; corolla usually with a few hairs, at least in the sinuses of the lobes ………….2. Tecoma stans<\/b>
3. Corolla regularly five-lobed, uniformly red or reddish-orange (very rarely yellow); anthers included; leaflets ovate to elliptic, serrate-dentate ……….4. Tecoma tenuiflora<\/b><\/div>\n
KEY TO SUBSPECIS OF TECOMA FULVA<\/u>
1. Leaves hirtellous; leaflets 11\u201321, broadly obovate, about as broad as long, mostly < 1 cm long.........a ssp. fulva<\/b>
1a. Leaves glabrous or, if hirtellous, the terminal leaflet oblong, > 1.5 cm long, much longer than broad; leaflets 1\u201317 <\/b>………2
2. Leaf rhachis clearly winged; lateral leaflets obovate to oblanceolate, two to three times as long as broad<\/b>; corolla regularly expanded from base, lacking a clearly differentiated basal tube, lobes < 7 mm long, the dorsal pair not united or united for < 2 mm; stamens at mouth of corolla, the filaments equal in length .........3
2a. Leaf rhachis unwinged or almost so; all leaflets oblong or oblong lanceolate, broadest near the centre or below, mostly three to five times as long as broad; corolla with a clearly differentiated basal tube, the lobes c. 10 mm long, the dorsal pair united for > 2 mm; two outer filaments longer than the inner pair, their anthers exserted …….5
3. Leaflets 13\u201317, coriaceous; the terminal leaflet only slightly larger than the laterals, obovate …………….b. ssp. arequipensis<\/b>
3a. Leaflets 1\u20139(-11), thin in texture, the terminal leaflet much larger than the laterals, oblong <\/b>………………4
4. Leaflets 1\u20137 (i.e. some leaves simple); branchlets and leaves hirtellous ……………..c. ssp. tanaeciiflora<\/b>
4a. Leaflets 3\u20139(-11), the leaves always divided into leaflets; branchlets and leaves glabrous or almost so <\/b>…………….. d. ssp. guarume<\/b>
5. Corolla 5\u20137 cm long; leaflets conspicuously serrate-dentate, teeth c. seven per centimetre …… e. ssp. altoandina<\/b>
5a. Corolla 4.5\u20135.5 cm long; leaflets weakly toothed, teeth three to four per centimetre………………f. ssp. garrocha<\/b><\/div>\n<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
\n
\n<\/div>\n
<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\n
\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/Tecoma%20smithii-4.jpg\"<\/a><\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Tecoma smithii.<\/a> : Attachments<\/span> (1<\/span>). 6 posts by 5 authors. <\/span><\/span><\/div>\n

Plant from smriti van Jaipur<\/font>. It is Tecoma smithii<\/i>.<\/span> <\/font><\/p>\n

Photo Taken on-1.3.2008<\/font><\/font><\/font><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\n

<\/font><\/div>\n

I think that this is a lighter color form (perhaps ‘Orange Jubilee’?) than the typically darker-orange T. x smithii (T. stans x T. capensis).<\/p>\n
\n

<\/i>Here is the more typical (at least in the USA) form of T. x smithii<\/i>:
http:\/\/pics.davesgarden.com\/pics\/Kell_1160332537_516.jpg<\/font><\/a>
Flowers are in large, nodding clusters. This hybrid does come, more or less, true from seed.
Other lighter-colored selections (perhaps F2 hybrids?) such as yours and this:
http:\/\/www.biopix.eu\/PhotosMedium\/JCS%20Tecoma%20smithii%2047104.JPG<\/font><\/a>
are indeed in the trade. I’m certain that your specimen is T. x smithii; I’m just not certain if it is a separate, named cultivar.\u00a0<\/p>\n

\n

<\/i>It is Tecoma fulva<\/p>\n

\n

<\/i><\/p>\n

After reading … comments on the identify of Tecoma<\/i> in question, we together did a bit of research on this issue and found that Tecoma fulva<\/i> has winged rachis<\/font> whereas the Tecoma x smithii<\/i> is wingless<\/font>. This is an obvious difference between these two taxa. Kindly see the link for Tecoma fulva <\/i>http:\/\/www.meemelink.com\/prints%20pages\/12834.Bignoniaceae%20-%20Tecoma%20fulva.htm<\/font><\/a> and for Tecoma x smithii for http:\/\/www.californiagardens.com\/Plant_Pages\/tecoma_smithii.htm<\/font><\/a><\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Finally we came to the conclusion that … plant belongs to Tecoma fulva<\/i>. <\/p>\n
\n<\/div>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\n
<\/p>\n
\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/Cahuato-Tecoma%20fulva-Gangajal-Nasik-DSCN5300-4.JPG\"<\/a><\/p>\n
\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/Cahuato-Tecoma%20fulva-Lalbagh-Bangalore-DSC_0501.JPG\"<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
Bignoniaceae Week :: Tecoma fulva : Cahuato : Nasik & Bangalore : 090113 : AK:<\/a> Pictures of Cahuato<\/b> or Tecoma fulva<\/i> from Nasik & Bangalore.<\/font><\/p>\n
An ornamental, cultivated, garden plant.<\/font><\/p>\n
\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
Appears so as per other images at Tecoma fulva<\/i><\/font><\/a><\/p>\n
\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\n
\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/Cahuato--2.jpg\"<\/a><\/div>\n
\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/Cahuato%201.jpg\"<\/a><\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n
Tecoma fulva- flora of Madhya Pradesh<\/a> :\u00a0\u00a0Attachments (2).\u00a0\u00a07 posts by 5 authors.<\/div>\n
Tecoma fulva<\/i> photographed at Betul, MP.
<\/font>Dated- 12.12.11
<\/font><\/font>Identified as T.fulva<\/i> as it has <\/font><\/font><\/span>winged<\/font> <\/font>rachis<\/font><\/p>\n
\n

<\/font><\/font><\/font><\/div>\n

Yes … u are correct.<\/p>\n
\n<\/div>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\n
\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/SL%2073-1.JPG\"<\/a><\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n
SL 73 011213<\/a> : Attachments (1). 2 posts by 2 authors.<\/div>\n
Please ID this small tree<\/font> with yellow flowers<\/font>. Photo was taken in Sri Lanka in Sep 2012.<\/font><\/p>\n
\n

Tecoma fulva<\/i>.<\/p>\n

\n
\u00a0<\/div>\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
Images by Raman Arunachalam<\/font><\/a>, (For more photos & complete details, click on the link)<\/span>\u00a0<\/p>\n
\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/Yellow%20Trumpet%20Flower%20-%20Canopy.jpg\"<\/a><\/div>\n
\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/Yellow%20Trumpet%20Flower%20-%20Leaf.jpg\"<\/a><\/div>\n
\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/Yellow%20Trumpet%20Flower%20-%20Flower%20Bud.jpg\"<\/a>\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/Yellow%20Trumpet%20Flower%20-%20Bark.jpg\"<\/a><\/div>\n
\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/Yellow%20Trumpet%20Flower%20-%20Flower.jpg\"<\/a><\/p>\n
\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/Yellow%20Trumpet%20Flower%20-%20Fruit.jpg\"<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/Yellow%20Trumpet%20Flower%20-%20Leaf%20Tender.jpg\"<\/a><\/div>\n

<\/span><\/font><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Bignoniaceae Week :: Tecoma stans var. angustata, Rehder <=> Yellow Trumpet Flower – Bangalore – RA:<\/font><\/a> 7 images.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

Yellow trumpet flower<\/b> is a variety of Tecoma stans<\/i>, the Yellow Bells. <\/b><\/span><\/div>\n
It has narrower and lacy leaflets which are more deeply toothed. The name angustata<\/i> means narrowed. This is a shrub or small tree that reaches 15-20 feet in height and can be pruned heavily after flowering to keep it compact. The fruit on is a “bean type” capsule about 8 inches long that ripens to a chocolate brown color.<\/font><\/span><\/div>\n
Dropbox link<\/font><\/a><\/p>\n
\n

<\/font><\/div>\n

\n
\n
It is Tecoma fulva<\/i><\/font><\/a>\u00a0as per keys and details herein.<\/div>\n
Tecoma stans<\/i> var. angustata<\/i><\/font><\/a>\u00a0looks different as per details herein.<\/p>\n
\n

<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

Trees of Lalbgh, Bangalore – RA – Tecoma stans var. angustata, Rehder <=> Yellow Trumpet Flower:<\/font><\/a> 7 images.<\/div>\n
Yellow trumpet<\/b> flower<\/b> is a variety of Tecoma stans<\/i>, the Yellow Bells.<\/font> It has narrower and lacy leaflets which are more deeply toothed. The name angustata<\/i> means narrowed. This is a shrub or small tree that reaches 15-20 feet in height and can be pruned heavily after flowering to keep it compact. The fruit on is a “bean type” capsule about 8 inches long that ripens to a chocolate brown color.<\/font>\u00a0<\/p>\n
\n
\n
It is Tecoma fulva<\/i><\/font><\/a>\u00a0as per keys and details herein.<\/div>\n
Tecoma stans<\/i> var. angustata<\/i><\/font><\/a>\u00a0looks different as per details herein.<\/div>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n
<\/a><\/div>\n

\u00a0\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/Tecoma%20smithii1.jpg\"<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n

Bignoniaceae week :: Nonnatives : SMP : Tecoma smithii. Pune.:<\/font><\/a> Tecoma smithii
<\/i>Dwarf Tecoma<\/b>
Leaves are compound the leaflets are smaller acute, cuneate, crenate.<\/font><\/div>\n
\n
<\/p>\n
It is Tecoma fulva<\/i><\/font><\/a>\u00a0as per keys and details herein.<\/p>\n
\n

<\/div>\n

\n\n\n\n
\n

Images by\u00a0Mala Bajaj<\/font><\/a> (Inserted by J.M.Garg)<\/span><\/p>\n

\n
\n
<\/a><\/div>\n
<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/IMG_4438.JPG\"<\/a><\/div>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/IMG_4436.JPG\"<\/a><\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Pls identify<\/font><\/a> : 4 posts by 4 authors. Attachments<\/span> (4)<\/font><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

<\/div>\n
Grows in Mumbai<\/font> <\/p>\n
\n

Loos like Tacoma smithii
Bignoniaceae<\/i> <\/p>\n

\n

efi page on <\/font>Tecoma fulva<\/i><\/font><\/a>\u00a0& Tecoma x smithii<\/i><\/font><\/a>\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n

\n

<\/span>This is Tecoma x smithii<\/i><\/p>\n

\n
It is Tecoma fulva<\/i><\/font><\/a>\u00a0as per keys and details herein.<\/p>\n
\n

As the rachis appears to be winged, it should be Tecoma<\/span> fulva<\/i><\/font><\/a>\u00a0as per keys and details herein.<\/p>\n

\n

I believe it as Tecoma fulva<\/i> and had been clarified years back.<\/p>\n

\n<\/div>\n
Yes ID seems correct for me.<\/p>\n
\n<\/div>\n
Tecoma is a beautiful ornamental, hence many cultivars available. We can not make a definite ID routinely other than T. stans , T. castanifolia <\/i>and\u00a0T. capensis<\/i> ……………..what we think as T. fulva<\/i> is a complex with many subspecies and cultivars. Here is a beautiful article on Taxonomy of Tecoma, from Bolivia, South America, native land of Tecoma<\/i>\u00a0 <\/font>https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/botlinnean\/article\/156\/1\/143\/2418201<\/font><\/a><\/div>\n
\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\n<\/div>\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n<\/colgroup>\n\n\n
Lalbagh Botanical Garden, Bangalore <\/font>on 08-11-09;<\/font>\u00a0<\/span><\/font><\/font><\/td>\nCampsis radicans ‘Flava’ at FOI – efloraofindia | Google Groups<\/font><\/span><\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n

\u00a0\u00a0<\/p><\/div>\n

\n\n\n\n
\n
\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/IMG_5956-ph-con-can-xy.jpg\"<\/a><\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Flower for ID-101109-RK-1 – indiantreepix | Google Groups<\/font><\/a><\/div>\n

<\/div>\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/IMG_20190420_180257309.jpg\"<\/a><\/div>\n
\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/IMG_20190420_180413250.jpg\"<\/a><\/div>\n
\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/IMG_20190420_180312747.jpg\"<\/a><\/div>\n
\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/IMG_20190420_180211878.jpg\"<\/a><\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
Tecoma Species for ID : 05MAY19 : AK-4<\/a> : 3 posts by 2 authors. Attachments (4)<\/font> <\/div>\n
\n
Since I saw you are updating\/reviewing some of the Tecoma<\/i> Species, I’m posting these pictures taken last month.<\/div>\n
A cultivated bush<\/font> seen in Muscat on he 20th of April.<\/font><\/div>\n
It was evening time and I could not get better pictures.<\/div>\n
Had thought of revisiting the place to click better pictures, but not able to go as yet.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n

Pl. check with Tecoma fulva<\/i><\/font><\/a>\u00a0<\/div>\n

\n
\n

Thanks … I will check.<\/p>\n

\n\n\n\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/P1360302.JPG\"<\/a><\/div>\n
\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/P1360304.JPG\"<\/a><\/div>\n
\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/P1360303.JPG\"<\/a><\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

<\/div>\n

Bignoniaceae for ID : Lalbagh Botanical Garden, Bangalore : 22DEC19 : AK-18<\/a> : 9 posts by 3 authors. Attachments (3)<\/font> <\/div>\n
Campsis<\/i> Species, similar to the one posted by me earlier.<\/p>\n
Campsis radicans<\/i> was suggested by me.<\/div>\n
\n
This was a small, potted plant.<\/font><\/div>\n
Seen yesterday at Lalbagh.<\/font><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n

More like Tecoma fulva<\/i> … Many cultivars in it. Actually we are not very clear on Tecoma species beyond T. stans<\/i> and T. castanifolia<\/i>.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/div>\n

\n
\n<\/div>\n
\n
You had suggested Tecoma fulva<\/i> earlier.<\/div>\n
Can it be\u00a0Tecoma fulva<\/i> subsp. guarume<\/i>?<\/span><\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n
I found the keys on net from\u00a0A revision of Tecoma Juss. (Bignoniaceae) in Bolivia<\/font><\/a> by JRI Wood (Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 2008, 156, 143\u2013172) as below:<\/div>\n
KEY TO TECOMA SPECIES IN BOLIVIA<\/u>
1. Corolla yellow (sometimes with reddish veins), ventricose above a shortly cylindrical, strongly demarcated base, \u00b1campanulate in form; anthers sparsely pilose ……2
1a. Corolla red, red and yellow, or orange (very rarely yellow), gradually widened from the base, \u00b1cylindrical-tubular in form; anthers glabrous ……..3
2. Leaves simple; corolla completely glabrous externally ………..1. Tecoma beckii<\/b>
2a. Leaves five- to nine-foliolate; corolla usually with a few hairs, at least in the sinuses of the lobes ………….2. Tecoma stans<\/b>
3. Corolla regularly five-lobed, uniformly red or reddish-orange (very rarely yellow); anthers included; leaflets ovate to elliptic, serrate-dentate ……….4. Tecoma tenuiflora<\/b><\/div>\n
KEY TO SUBSPECIS OF TECOMA FULVA<\/u>
1. Leaves hirtellous; leaflets 11\u201321, broadly obovate, about as broad as long, mostly < 1 cm long.........a ssp. fulva<\/b>
1a. Leaves glabrous or, if hirtellous, the terminal leaflet oblong, > 1.5 cm long, much longer than broad; leaflets 1\u201317 <\/b>………2
2. Leaf rhachis clearly winged; lateral leaflets obovate to oblanceolate, two to three times as long as broad<\/b>; corolla regularly expanded from base, lacking a clearly differentiated basal tube, lobes < 7 mm long, the dorsal pair not united or united for < 2 mm; stamens at mouth of corolla, the filaments equal in length .........3
2a. Leaf rhachis unwinged or almost so; all leaflets oblong or oblong lanceolate, broadest near the centre or below, mostly three to five times as long as broad; corolla with a clearly differentiated basal tube, the lobes c. 10 mm long, the dorsal pair united for > 2 mm; two outer filaments longer than the inner pair, their anthers exserted …….5
3. Leaflets 13\u201317, coriaceous; the terminal leaflet only slightly larger than the laterals, obovate …………….b. ssp. arequipensis<\/b>
3a. Leaflets 1\u20139(-11), thin in texture, the terminal leaflet much larger than the laterals, oblong <\/b>………………4
4. Leaflets 1\u20137 (i.e. some leaves simple); branchlets and leaves hirtellous ……………..c. ssp. tanaeciiflora<\/b>
4a. Leaflets 3\u20139(-11), the leaves always divided into leaflets; branchlets and leaves glabrous or almost so <\/b>…………….. d. ssp. guarume<\/b>
5. Corolla 5\u20137 cm long; leaflets conspicuously serrate-dentate, teeth c. seven per centimetre …… e. ssp. altoandina<\/b>
5a. Corolla 4.5\u20135.5 cm long; leaflets weakly toothed, teeth three to four per centimetre………………f. ssp. garrocha<\/b><\/div>\n
It is very difficult to see many details with your very small images. However, Leaf rachis appears to be winged and I see 7 leaflets. So ssp. guarume <\/b>is possible.<\/div>\n
Pl. check the above keys in detail.<\/div>\n
It appears close to images\u00a0of ssp. guarume <\/b>seen at TechieOldFox<\/font><\/a>\u00a0and Flora and fauna website<\/font><\/a>, but looks different from those at Kew Database<\/font><\/a>.<\/p>\n
\n<\/div>\n
Thanks … I had suggested the same earlier.<\/div>\n
\n
\n<\/div>\n
Will attach the pictures one at a time.<\/div>\n
Attachments<\/span> (1<\/font>)<\/font><\/span> – 5 mb<\/p>\n
\n<\/div>\n
Attachments<\/span> (1<\/font>)<\/font><\/span> – 5 mb<\/p>\n
\n

Yes, possible.<\/p>\n

\n

<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n
<\/p>\n

<\/font><\/p>\n

References:<\/span><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/font><\/p>\n

The Plant List 1<\/font><\/a>\u00a0 <\/font>The Plant List 2<\/font><\/a> \u00a0<\/font>GRIN<\/font><\/a>\u00a0\u00a0<\/font><\/span>Flowers of India<\/font><\/a>\u00a0 <\/font>Dave’s garden<\/font><\/a>\u00a0 <\/font>Bignoniaceae – Tecoma fulva<\/font><\/a>\u00a0 <\/font>Tecoma – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia<\/font><\/span><\/a><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Tecoma fulva (Cav.) G.Don, Gen. Hist. 4: 224 1838 and its subspecies; \u00a0 Cahuato; \u00a0 As per efi thread Tecoma fulva has winged rachis whereas the Tecoma x smithii is wingless;\u00a0\u00a0 As per efi thread: What we think as T. fulva is a complex with many subspecies and cultivars. Here…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"ht-kb-category":[5201],"ht-kb-tag":[],"class_list":["post-1293789","ht_kb","type-ht_kb","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","ht_kb_category-tecoma"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/efloraofindia.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/ht-kb\/1293789","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/efloraofindia.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/ht-kb"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/efloraofindia.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/ht_kb"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/efloraofindia.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/efloraofindia.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1293789"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/efloraofindia.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/ht-kb\/1293789\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/efloraofindia.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1293789"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"ht_kb_category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/efloraofindia.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/ht-kb-category?post=1293789"},{"taxonomy":"ht_kb_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/efloraofindia.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/ht-kb-tag?post=1293789"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}