<\/p>\n
\n<\/span><\/font>Fora of British India mentions Erigeron alpinus<\/i>, and also many varieties. Frank Smythe, in his book, The Valley of Flowers, also report collecting Erigeron alpinus<\/i>. However, I am aware of the fact that this will be some variety of Erigeron alpinus<\/i>, although I have no clue which one. My casual opinion was Erigeron kumaunensis<\/i>, without any good reason.
Any help on that will be appreciated.<\/p>\n
\n
I am thinking Erigeron alpinus<\/i> var. multicaulis<\/i> – small flower-heads, not solitary…<\/p>\n
\nHere is a reply from Bernhard Dickore, the German botanist who identified
Cotoneaster adpressus<\/i> for us:
“your plant is Myriactis wallichii<\/i> (while there remain some problems in this genus as well). Erigeron<\/i> is a horror in the Himalayas, numerous names for few species only, E. alpinus<\/i> does not occur in the Himalayas at all.”<\/p>\n
\nThanks … for efforts and Bernhard Dickore for identification help… should I take this as Myriactis wallichii<\/i>, if our experts are convinced?<\/p>\n
\n
No question of this plant being Myriactis wallichii<\/i>. I wonder how can we believe a species which has often been treated as synonym of M. nepalensis<\/i> (differing just by shorter habit, smaller heads, linear ray florets, elliptic-lanceolate leaves<\/font>) can be so different. The large foliaceous bracts outside the head are very distinctive as are longer involucre.<\/font> We should be looking for a different genus.<\/p>\n
\n