{"id":1414032,"date":"2018-10-24T13:35:07","date_gmt":"2018-10-24T13:35:07","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2024-12-24T11:55:51","modified_gmt":"2024-12-24T06:25:51","slug":"pseudorhipsalis-ramulosa","status":"publish","type":"ht_kb","link":"https:\/\/efloraofindia.com\/efi\/pseudorhipsalis-ramulosa\/","title":{"rendered":"Pseudorhipsalis ramulosa"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n\n\n\n
\n
\n
Pseudorhipsalis ramulosa <\/em>(Salm-Dyck) Barthlott, Bradleya 9: 90 1991<\/em>. (syn: Cereus<\/font><\/i> <\/font>ramulosus<\/font><\/i> <\/font>Salm-Dyck<\/font><\/span><\/span><\/a>; Disocactus<\/font><\/i> <\/font>ramulosus<\/font><\/i> <\/font>(Salm-Dyck) Kimnach<\/font><\/span><\/span><\/a>; Disocactus<\/font><\/i> <\/font>ramulosus<\/font><\/i> <\/font>var.<\/font><\/span> <\/font>angustissimus<\/font><\/i> <\/font>(Weber) Kimnach<\/font><\/span><\/span><\/a>; Disocactus<\/font><\/i> <\/font>ramulosus<\/font><\/i> <\/font>f.<\/font><\/span> <\/font>angustissimus<\/font><\/i> <\/font>(F.A.C.Weber) Kimnach<\/font><\/span><\/span><\/a>; Disocactus<\/font><\/i> <\/font>ramulosus<\/font><\/i> <\/font>var.<\/font><\/span> <\/font>ramosissima<\/font><\/i> <\/font>(F.A.C. Weber) Kimnach<\/font><\/span><\/span><\/a>; Epiphyllum<\/font><\/i> <\/font>ciliare<\/font><\/i> <\/font>Pfeiff.<\/font><\/span><\/span><\/a>; Epiphyllum<\/font><\/i> <\/font>ciliatum<\/font><\/i> <\/font>Pfeiff.<\/font><\/span><\/span><\/a>; Epiphyllum<\/font><\/i> <\/font>ramulosum<\/font><\/i> <\/font>Pfeiff.<\/font><\/span><\/span><\/a>; Hariota<\/font><\/i> <\/font>coriacea<\/font><\/i> <\/font>(Pol.) Kuntze<\/font><\/span><\/span><\/a>; Hariota<\/font><\/i> <\/font>ramulosa<\/font><\/i> <\/font>(Salm-Dyck) Kuntze<\/font><\/span><\/span><\/a>; Hariota<\/font><\/i> <\/font>ramulosa<\/font><\/i> <\/font>(Salm-Dyck) Lem.<\/font><\/span><\/span><\/a>; Pseudorhipsalis<\/font><\/i> <\/font>ramulosa<\/font><\/i> <\/font>f.<\/font><\/span> <\/font>ramulosa<\/font><\/i> <\/font><\/span><\/a>; Rhipsalis<\/font><\/i> <\/font>angustissima<\/font><\/i> <\/font>F.A.C. Weber<\/font><\/span><\/span><\/a>; Rhipsalis<\/font><\/i> <\/font>coriacea<\/font><\/i> <\/font>Pol.<\/font><\/span><\/span><\/a>; Rhipsalis<\/font><\/i> <\/font>leiophloea<\/font><\/i> <\/font>Vaupel<\/font><\/span><\/span><\/a>; Rhipsalis<\/font><\/i> <\/font>purpusii<\/font><\/i> <\/font>Weing.<\/font><\/span><\/span><\/a>; Rhipsalis<\/font><\/i> <\/font>ramosissima<\/font><\/i> <\/font>F.A.C. Weber<\/font><\/span><\/span><\/a>; Rhipsalis<\/font><\/i> <\/font>ramulosa<\/font><\/i> <\/font>(Salm-Dyck) Pfeiff.<\/font><\/span><\/span><\/a>);<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
\n
\n<\/div>\n
<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\n
\n
\n
<\/a><\/div>\n

<\/a><\/div>\n

\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/_DSC0369.JPG\"<\/a><\/div>\n

\u00a0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Pseudorhipsalis ramulosa (Salm-Dyck) Barthlott<\/a> : 15 posts by 3 authors. Attachments<\/span> (3<\/font>)- around 400 kb each.<\/font><\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/div>\n

<\/p>\n
Location:\u00a0Hong Kong Park<\/font>\u00a0\u00a0<\/span>
<\/font><\/font><\/div>\n
Date: 15 August\u00a02018<\/font><\/span><\/div>\n
Elevation: 200 ft.<\/font><\/span><\/div>\n
Habit : Cultivated<\/font><\/span><\/div>\n
Syn : Rhipsalis ramulosa<\/em> (Salm-Dyck) Pfeiff.<\/font>
<\/font><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n

<\/p>\n
\n

<\/font><\/span><\/div>\n

epiphytic member of ultimately the a cactus group. flower seem akin to xmas cacti. i have seen red stems only but the internet shows both green and red. so its ok. was it labeled at the show?<\/p>\n
\n\n\n\n
\n
\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/_DSC0367.JPG\"<\/a><\/div>\n

\u00a0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

You are right\u00a0\u00a0<\/div>\n

Attachments<\/span> (1<\/font>)<\/font><\/span> – 727 kb.<\/div>\n
\n
\n

ah! see they call it red coral<\/strong>. i find that in my hands some cacti turn red in bright spring sunshine. may be this plant has the ability to do the same. very interesting. thank you for sharing the label<\/p>\n

\n

You should also give name of the cultivar along with species name as in the plate, otherwise it creates confusion as original species may look totally different.\u00a0<\/p>\n

\n

Ok …<\/p>\n

\n

its rhipsalis<\/em>, etc etc\u00a0not pseudorhipsalis<\/em> i thnk per the label<\/p>\n

\n<\/div>\n
http:\/\/www.theplantlist.org\/<\/font>tpl1.1\/record\/kew-2417612<\/font><\/a><\/div>\n
\n
\n
yes i had seen the plant list page, trying to label my pictures from an RHS show a couple of years ago. i thought the, and do now, its irrational.<\/div>\n
—<\/div>\n

my personal bias is when something positive exists, why go with negative or doubtful. the case here: rhipsalis<\/em> versus pseudorhyipsalis<\/em>. <\/p>\n

its like saying. human versus pseudohuman are the same!!!! take your pick<\/div>\n
===<\/div>\n
i like to be logical regardless of what the plant list says<\/p>\n
\n
Actually, I do not have in depth kowledge about the plan world since I am not a botanist.\u00a0I just follow net and instruction from experts like you people so some mistkes will be there. I am still learning and trying to learn.<\/div>\n
There are lot of things which I am still confused.<\/p>\n
\n

…, that’s ok. most of us are not botanist either<\/p>\n

Gargji, Dinesh, Satish Phadke, Shrikant, Neil Soares et al to name a few. thats the beauty of this group. i am not a botanist either<\/div>\n
\n
==<\/div>\n
i just am compulsive and don’t believe everything an expert committee says. decisions by a committee can never be trusted. consensus is good but decisions, no!!<\/p>\n
\n

Truly said.<\/p>\n

\n

<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

<\/div>\n
<\/p>\n

<\/font><\/p>\n

References:<\/span><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/font>The Plant List Ver.1.1<\/a>\u00a0\u00a0<\/span>IPNI<\/a>
\n\u00a0Catalogue of Life<\/font><\/a>\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span>Top Tropicals<\/a>\u00a0\u00a0<\/span>World of Succulents<\/a>\u00a0 Flora Fauna Web<\/a>\u00a0 llifle<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Pseudorhipsalis ramulosa (Salm-Dyck) Barthlott, Bradleya 9: 90 1991. (syn: Cereus ramulosus Salm-Dyck; Disocactus ramulosus (Salm-Dyck) Kimnach; Disocactus ramulosus var. angustissimus (Weber) Kimnach; Disocactus ramulosus f. angustissimus (F.A.C.Weber) Kimnach; Disocactus ramulosus var. ramosissima (F.A.C. Weber) Kimnach; Epiphyllum ciliare Pfeiff.; Epiphyllum ciliatum Pfeiff.; Epiphyllum ramulosum Pfeiff.; Hariota coriacea (Pol.) Kuntze; Hariota ramulosa…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"ht-kb-category":[9048],"ht-kb-tag":[],"class_list":["post-1414032","ht_kb","type-ht_kb","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","ht_kb_category-pseudorhipsalis"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/efloraofindia.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/ht-kb\/1414032","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/efloraofindia.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/ht-kb"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/efloraofindia.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/ht_kb"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/efloraofindia.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/efloraofindia.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1414032"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/efloraofindia.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/ht-kb\/1414032\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/efloraofindia.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1414032"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"ht_kb_category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/efloraofindia.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/ht-kb-category?post=1414032"},{"taxonomy":"ht_kb_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/efloraofindia.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/ht-kb-tag?post=1414032"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}