ecologycenter<\/a><\/p>\nIn my opinion (off-course with over-simplification) being located in the tropics, having Western Ghat mountains, a lot of rainfall throughout the year and ample exploratory work Kerala has a high number of species and endemic elements.<\/p>\n
New species described may get merged into older species with revisionary works but still there will be a large number of species and endemics in flora of Kerala as compared to many Indian states.<\/p>\n
In India, as per the information in the above table, Sikkim with just 8586 km2<\/sup>\u00a0area has high endemisms- one endemic species for every 54 km2<\/sup>\u00a0while Kerala has one endemic species for every 108 km2<\/sup>.<\/p>\nThe last word- answer is not simple and there are many known (and also unknown) reasons behind high diversity and endemism in Kerala.<\/p>\n
\nGood question …!<\/p>\n
As one of the major biodiversity hotspots of India, the Western Ghats harbors a great species diversity with a high number of\u00a0endemics. Also, thanks to the active fieldwork and\u00a0special documentation and\u00a0exploration programs, many new species are being discovered from previously under- and un-explored areas.<\/p>\n
\n
That said, there are concerns as discussed earlier. Another concern is that there is no clear-cut definition of delimiting characters that qualify a new species. Of the two kinds of botanists, the lumpers and splitters, the latter kind mainly contributes to the inflated number of new species. Of course there are exceptions. I documented more than 30 intra- and infra-specific variations from my PhD study area alone but plants with some of these documented variations (such as different flower color, leaf shape) have been recently described as new species by folks even working in reputed institutions. There is a tremendous interest among botanists to publish new taxa. This is fueled in part by the current job offer and promotion settings that credit and\u00a0support quantity rather than the quality of research publications.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
The review and publication process must be strengthened and made transparent. Every journal should require sufficient proof and authenticity of the Type specimens. There are so many predatory journals that publish anything if the processing fee is paid. Young researchers should be made aware of these and papers published in these journals should not be considered when it comes to job offers or promotions. Also, we need many revisioners, and while revising a genus or family the botanists should consider and use the data from various fields of botany such as morphology, anatomy, palynology, photochemistry and molecular biology, with collaborations from international experts.<\/p>\n
\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
You have spelled out the hard truth and I agree\u00a0with your views on the current scenario.<\/p>\n
\n
Thank you all for such a valid discussion.<\/div>\n
Thank you … for opening this discussion.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
I feel that many of the reasons or answers for the question are already covered in previous mails.<\/div>\n
I have a few more things to discuss.<\/div>\n
Myers et al. (2000) and Mittermier et al. (2011) and several others have explained multidimensional aspects of species endemism.<\/div>\n
I am attaching these papers herewith for your perusal.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Few (more) reasons for Kerala having high endemism are:<\/div>\n
\n
\n- Habitat heterogeneity<\/li>\n
- High frequency of ecotones<\/li>\n
- Micro -habitat and -climate variations.<\/li>\n
- Reduced number of dry months.<\/li>\n
- Geographical characters (for eg. Westward facing geography that is beneficial in getting\/tapping maximum light).<\/li>\n
- Diverse edaphic features.<\/li>\n
- The Total geographical area is smaller, resulting in smaller habitats. This might enhance genetic drift as smaller populations help drift and fixation faster.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
There may be other reasons too.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Thanks …. for speaking some eye openers.<\/div>\n
You are absolutely right even ecotypes and ecads are also treated to be species discoveries.<\/div>\n
I have seen several colour and size variations in the same individual plants (of several species) across years during my phenology observations.<\/div>\n
Further, if a plant flowers in a different season, it may show some variations.<\/div>\n
This might be related to variation in the climate or local micro habitat characteristics.<\/div>\n
As … mentioned, habitat variation is a general fact for tropical parts of the world, which is proved by several studies. Most such studies are from elsewhere, unfortunately, there are not many studies from our regions.<\/div>\n
Kerala is blessed with several taxonomists across various time periods and we have few institutes and centres dedicated for taxonomy.<\/div>\n
Several species have been published with only one sighting and the majority of these new species do not have any further references in any later studies or inventories.<\/div>\n
No further evaluation, observation, or sightings about the majority of the newly published ‘species’.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Further, as … rightly pointed out, there are no set standards to call a plant a new species.
\n2 attachments.<\/p>\n
\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
As regards parameters of determining a new species, this procedure cannot be standardized at all. I wrote these lines somewhere:<\/p>\n
Only an experienced taxonomist expertising on a particular group can give a sound judgement on delimitation. From numerical taxonomy, through cladistics we are now in the era of molecular phylogenetics. Therefore, the conclusions on morphological (both external and internal) should now be corroborated with molecular studies. The delimiting characters vary from group to group, e.g. a single inflorescence type delimits the family Compositae but a combination of characters determine some others.\u00a0 Only an expert\/monographer rather than a random taxonomist\/floristics worker can give a sound judgement. Moreover, you cannot standardize the taxonomic characters through mathematical formulae and statistical analysis and apply them for delimitation for stabilizing the nomenclature. You must depend on expert opinion only for delimitation of genera and infrageneric taxa.<\/p>\n
\n<\/div>\n
My comments may kindly be taken as a pure scientific discussion. I apologise if I have hurt sentiments of someone by using some harsh words. In fact we are noticing random new descriptions by some persons in each and every group. The Plant Discoveries published by BSI is documenting such publications in India but there is no comprehensive publication consolidating the nomenclatural changes including mergers in Indian perspective. POWO, to some extent, tries to keep the nomenclature up to date in relation to IPNI but it has own limitations. So, we at eFI should try to keep our database most up to date, as far as possible. This will further enhance the grandeur of the group.<\/p>\n
\n
Last year I had an opportunity to talk to … of Uppasala Universty, while discussing of Boswellia ovalifoliolata, he said if it is a true endemic, there must be some other endemic species in the area, then it will not be in association with common species of the area; it is true, in A.P. Seshachalam and Velugonda hills harbours majority of endemics of the state; B.serrata and B.Ovalifolialata are never seen in same vicinity.
\nthank you for enlightenment and provide a chance to express my observations.<\/p>\n
\n
\n<\/div>\n
There are two aspects of this discussion here:<\/p>\n
1. Taxonomy and new species: One of our valued members said that it needs good expertise to publish a new species and only experienced taxonomists can give a sound judgement. I actually think the opposite\u00a0of this. Only a good taxonomist can do good taxonomy- I agree. But only a good taxonomist misuses taxonomy to publish such silly new species. People who have no idea about taxonomy cannot publish a taxonomic paper.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
2. The diversity in Western Ghats: Undoubtedly, western ghats has high diversity and with respect to Kerala, looking at the terrain and precipitation patterns there is very high habitat heterogeneity too. Hence the chances of finding interesting diverse group of plants are higher.<\/p>\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
Just my personal thoughts.<\/p>\n
\n<\/div>\n
\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
What is the secret behind so many endemic species in Kerala ?: While browsing through Flora of Peninsular India, I generally found that Kerala is having so many endemics (including narrow endemics with distribution shown in only one place or district) compared to other states like Tamil Nadu and Karnataka…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"ht-kb-category":[5316],"ht-kb-tag":[],"class_list":["post-1450177","ht_kb","type-ht_kb","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","ht_kb_category-botanical-terms-etc"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/efloraofindia.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/ht-kb\/1450177","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/efloraofindia.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/ht-kb"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/efloraofindia.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/ht_kb"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/efloraofindia.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/efloraofindia.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1450177"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/efloraofindia.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/ht-kb\/1450177\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/efloraofindia.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1450177"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"ht_kb_category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/efloraofindia.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/ht-kb-category?post=1450177"},{"taxonomy":"ht_kb_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/efloraofindia.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/ht-kb-tag?post=1450177"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}